Fecal Fusobacterium nucleatum for the diagnosis of colorectal tumor: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

We conducted a meta‐analysis with ten studies to explore the diagnostic accuracy of fecal Fusobacterium nucleatum for colorectal cancer and adenoma. We found that fecal F. nucleatum had a certain value for the diagnosis of colorectal tumor and it was promising to be a noninvasive screening method for colorectal tumor.

Abstract

The fecal Fusobacterium nucleatum has been reported as a potential noninvasive biomarker for colorectal tumor in several studies, but its exact diagnostic accuracy was ambiguous due to the wide range of sensitivity and specificity. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fecal F. nucleatum for colorectal tumor, we searched electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, without any date and language restrictions. Two reviewers independently extracted data and appraised study quality with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. We included ten studies comprising 13 cohorts for colorectal cancer (CRC) and seven cohorts for colorectal adenoma (CRA). A total of 1450 patients and 1421 controls for CRC and 656 patients and 827 controls for CRA were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of fecal F. nucleatum for CRC were 71% (95% CI, 61%‐79%) and 76% (95% CI, 66%‐84%), with the area under the receiver‐operating characteristics (AUC) curve of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76‐0.83). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of fecal F. nucleatum for CRA were 36% (95% CI, 27%‐46%) and 73% (95% CI, 65%‐79%), with an AUC of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.56‐0.65). Substantial heterogeneity among studies existed, which was partly caused by DNA extraction kits, regions of study, sample size, and demographic characteristics of participants. Fecal F. nucleatum was valuable for the diagnosis of CRC although it performed below expectation. For CRA, the specificity of fecal F. nucleatum indicated the possibility of noninvasive screening. Subgroup analyses for adenoma were incomplete due to lack of data. Heterogeneity limited the credibility of the study.

http://bit.ly/2SWumE4