Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

Αναζήτηση αυτού του ιστολογίου

Τετάρτη 20 Ιουλίου 2022

Diagnostic Delay in Human Papillomavirus Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Diagnostic Delay in Human Papillomavirus Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Delays in care related to evaluations by multiple providers and misdiagnosis prolonged time to diagnosis in HPV(−)OPSCC. Improved patient and provider education is necessary to expedite the diagnosis of HPV(−)OPSCC.


Objective

Failure to recognize symptoms of non-human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV(−)OPSCC) at presentation can delay diagnosis and treatment. We aim to identify patient factors and provider practice patterns that delay presentation and care in HPV(−)OPSCC.

Methods

Retrospective review at a tertiary care center. Patients with HPV(−)OPSCC receiving treatment from 2006 to 2016. Patients were excluded if their date of symptom onset or diagnosis was unknown after thorough review of the electronic medical record or their tissue was not tested for HPV or p16. Clinical data, workup, and care timelines were abstracted. Univariate and multivariable linear regressions were performed to determine associations between patient and provider factors and delays in care.

Results

Of 70 included patients, 52 (74%) were male and mean age was 60.5 (SD = 9.0). Median time to diagnosis was 69 days (IQR = 32–127 days), with a median latency of 30 days (IQR = 12–61 days) from symptom onset to first presentation and 19.5 days (IQR = 4–46 days) from the first presentation to diagnosis. Most patients visited at least 2 providers (n = 52, 74%) before diagnosis. Evaluation by 3 or more providers prior to diagnosis was associated with significant delays in diagnosis of nearly a year (357.7 days, p < 0.001) and being treated or prescribed analgesia prior to diagnosis was significantly associated with delays in diagnosis (p = 0.004) on univariate regression analysis.

Conclusions

Delays in care related to evaluations by multiple providers and misdiagnosis prolonged time to diagnosis in HPV(−)OPSCC. Improved patient and provider education is necessary to expedite the diagnosis of HPV(−)OPSCC.

Level of Evidence

Level 4 Laryngoscope, 2022

View on Web

Safety and efficacy of molnupiravir in SARS‐CoV‐2 infected patients: a real‐life experience

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Introduction

Since the start of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, several treatments have been proposed to cure Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and prevent it. Molnupiravir is a ribonucleoside prodrug of N-hydroxycytidine with an in vitro e in vivo activity against SARS-CoV-2.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all people treated with Molnupiravir between the 10th of January and the 31th of March 2022 at the University Hospital of Sassari. Molnupiravir was prescribed, according to the Italian Agency of Drug indications, in patients with recent symptoms onset (≤5five days), no need of oxygen supplementation, and with a high risk of disease progression for the presence chronic diseases.

Results

We included 192 people with a mean age of 70.4±15.4 years; 144 (75%) patients were over 60 years. During the follow-up, 20 (10.4%) patients showed a disease progression. At the multivariate analysis, older age, having neurological dis ease, and having dyspnea at the onset of the symptoms, and acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infeciton during an hospital admission were associated with an increased risk of progression. On the contrary, early start of treatment was associated with a reduced risk of disease progression. Molnupiravir was also extremely safe since 13 (6.8%) adverse events were reported, with only one interruption.

Conclusion

Our study shows that Monlupiravir confirmed its efficacy and safety in a real-life cohort that included a high percentage of elderly people with a high comorbidity burden.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

View on Web

Pediatric hematology providers’ contraceptive practices for female adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease: A national survey

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Background

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) women with sickle cell disease (SCD) have increased pregnancy-related health risks and are prescribed potentially teratogenic medications, yet limited data are available regarding pediatric SCD provider contraceptive practices. We aimed to assess pediatric hematology providers' beliefs, practices, motivators, and barriers for providing contraceptive care to female AYAs with SCD.

Methods

Guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM), we developed a 25-question, web-based survey to assess practices. Survey links were distributed nationwide to pediatric SCD and/or general hematology providers through their publicly available emails and by request to directors of U.S.-accredited Pediatric Hematology-Oncology fellowship programs for distribution to their SCD providers. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square analysis, and logistic regression.

Results

Of 177 respondents, 160 surveys meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed. Most providers reported counseling (77.5%) and referring female AYA patients for contraception (90.8%), but fewer reported prescribing contraception (41.8%). Proportionally fewer trainees provided counseling compared with established providers (54% vs. 85%, p < .001), with a similar trend for prescribing (p = .05). Prescription practices did not differ significantly by provider beliefs regarding potential teratogenicity of hydroxyurea. Key motivators included patient request and disclosure of sexual activity. Key barriers included inadequate provider training, limited visit time, and perceived patient/parent interest.

Conclusion

Provider contraceptive practices for female AYAs with SCD varied, especially by provider status. Health beliefs regarding teratogenic potential of hydroxyurea did not correlate with contraceptive practices. Clinical guidelines, provider training, and patient/parent decision-making tools may be tested to assess whether provider contraceptive practices could be improved.

View on Web