Application of risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma starting chemotherapy, a real‐world evaluation

Venous thromboembolism causes significant morbidity and mortality in patients with multiple myeloma, but there is little evidence of efficacy of thromboprophylaxis guidelines. Our study shows that IMWG thromboprophylaxis guidelines may not be followed systematically, which highlights an area for significant clinical improvement. Additionally, multiple myeloma patients may clot later and increase or decrease their clotting risk over time, indicating a possible need for continual risk assessment throughout the disease course.

Abstract

Introduction

Within the first year of diagnosis, up to 1 in 3 multiple myeloma (MM) patients will experience a venous thromboembolism (VTE). The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) has thromboprophylaxis guidelines that stratify patients into low or high risk for thrombosis and subsequently recommend thromboprophylaxis, but it is unknown if these recommendations are being followed or if they are effective. The purpose of this study was to assess efficacy of the IMWG guidelines and investigate other potential VTE risk factors.

Methods

Study participants were treated at the University of Kansas Medical Center between 2007 and 2013, and charts were reviewed to extract data. Cases (MM and VTE) were matched to controls (MM and no VTE) at approximately 1:3 ratio based on gender, age (±5 years), and time of MM diagnosis (±5 years).

Results

A total of 80 cases and 211 controls were matched. Most patients (82%) were considered high risk for experiencing a VTE at the time of their MM diagnosis and 18% were considered low risk. Neither risk category (P = 0.16) nor thromboprophylaxis at baseline (P = 0.37) predicted VTE, though cases were more likely than controls to have an increased risk of thrombosis at the time of clot compared to their baseline risk (P = 0.09).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that IMWG guidelines are not being consistently followed and therefore could not be validated. Additional risk factors were not identified, but risk for VTE may change over time suggesting patients may require ongoing assessment of VTE risk and thromboprophylaxis throughout the disease course.

http://bit.ly/2CATo5X