Partial pulpotomy with two bioactive cements in permanent teeth of 6‐to‐18‐year‐old patients with signs and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis: a non‐inferiority randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Aim

To compare the outcome of partial pulpotomy using two cements, ProRoot MTA (Dentsply, Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK, USA) and Biodentine (Septodont, Saint‐Maur‐des‐Fossés, France), in permanent teeth of 6‐ to‐18‐year‐old patients with signs and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis. Furthermore, frequencies of perceptible grey discolouration caused by the cements were compared.

Methodology

Sixty‐nine permanent first molars with signs and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis, from 69 patients, were included. All operators performed partial pulpotomy under a standardised protocol. Teeth were allocated, using a website‐generated number of simple randomisation, to partial pulpotomy with either ProRoot MTA (37 teeth) or Biodentine (32 teeth), and were restored with composite resin or stainless steel crowns. Patients were recalled every 6 months. To be categorized as having success, the evaluated tooth must have had both clinical and radiographic success. In addition, photographs of treated teeth were evaluated for frequency of perceptible grey discolouration. Success rates between the two cements were compared using the Fisher exact test. The frequencies of perceptible grey discolouration were compared using the Chi‐square test. The percentage difference was estimated by 95% confidence interval and the level of significant difference was P<0.05.

Results

At a mean follow‐up of 32.2+17.9 months, a total of 67 teeth, 37 with ProRoot MTA and 30 with Biodentine, were available for evaluation. The mean age of participants was 10+2.1 years and there were no differences in the baseline variables (gender, age, tooth type, periapical status, stage of root development, final restoration, and follow‐up period) between the groups. The overall success in both groups was 90%, with 92% for ProRoot MTA and 87% for Biodentine (difference, 5%; 95% confidence interval, ‐9% to 19%, P=0.487), suggesting that Biodentine was non‐inferior to ProRoot MTA. Perceptible grey discolouration was observed in both groups, 80% for teeth treated with ProRoot MTA and 27% for teeth treated with Biodentine, with a significant difference between the materials (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Permanent teeth with signs and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis in 6‐ to‐18‐year‐old patients were successfully treated with partial pulpotomy using both cements. Biodentine exhibited significantly less frequency of discolouration than did ProRoot MTA.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

http://bit.ly/2CoxzF9