Impact of a Shared Decision Making Intervention on Healthcare Utilization: A Secondary Analysis of the Chest Pain Choice Multicenter Randomized Trial

Abstract

Background

Patients at low risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are frequently admitted for observation and cardiac testing, resulting in substantial burden and cost to the patient and the healthcare system.

Objectives

The purpose of this investigation was to measure the effect of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid (CPC) on overall healthcare utilization as well as utilization of specific services both during the index emergency department visit and in the subsequent 45 days.

Methods

This was a planned secondary analysis of data from a pragmatic multicenter randomized trial of shared decision making in adults presenting to the emergency department with chest pain who were being considered for observation unit admission for cardiac stress testing or coronary computed tomography angiography. The trial compared an intervention group engaged in shared decision making facilitated by CPC decision aid to a control group receiving usual care (UC). Hospital-level billing data were used to measure utilization for the index emergency department visit and during the following 45 days. Patients in both groups also were asked to keep a diary recording healthcare utilization over the same 45-day period. Outcomes assessed included length of time in the emergency department and observation, emergency department visits, office visits, hospitalizations, testing, imaging, and procedures.

Results

Of the 898 patients included in the original trial, we were able to contact 834 (92.9%) patients for 45-day health care diary review. There was no difference in patient reported healthcare utilization between the study arms. Hospital-level billing data were obtained for all 898 (100%) patients. During the initial emergency department visit the length of stay was similar, and there was no difference in the frequency of observation unit admission between study arms. However, the mean observation unit length of stay was 95 minutes [95%CI 40.8, 149.8] shorter in the CPC arm and the mean number of tests was lower in the CPC arm [Decrease in 19.4 imaging studies per 100 patients, 95%CI 15.5, 23.3]. When evaluating the entire encounter and follow-up period, the intervention arm underwent fewer tests [Decrease in 125.6 tests per 100 patients, 95%CI 29.3, 221.6]. More specifically, there were fewer advanced cardiac imaging tests completed [25.8 fewer per 100 patients, 95% CI 3.74, 47.9] in the intervention arm.

Conclusions

Shared decision-making in low risk chest pain can lead to decreased diagnostic testing without worsening outcomes measured over 45 days.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

http://ift.tt/2yOysGr