Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

Αναζήτηση αυτού του ιστολογίου

Δευτέρα 18 Σεπτεμβρίου 2017

The predictive role of interim PET after the first chemotherapy cycle and sequential evaluation of response to ABVD in Hodgkin lymphoma patients - the Polish Lymphoma Research Group (PLRG) Observational Study

Abstract
Background: Interim PET after 2 ABVD cycles (iPET2) predicts treatment outcome in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). To test if an earlier assessment of chemosensitivity would improve the prediction accuracy, we launched a prospective, multicenter observational study aimed at assessing the predictive value (PV) of iPET after 1 ABVD (iPET1) and the kinetics of response assessed by sequential PET scanning.Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed cHL underwent interim PET scan after one ABVD course (iPET1). PETs were interpreted according to the Deauville score (DS) as negative (-) (DS 1-3) and positive (+) (DS 4,5). Patients with iPET1 DS 3-5 underwent iPET2.Results: 106 early (I-IIA) and 204 advanced (IIB-IV) patients were enrolled between 01/2008 and 10/2014. iPET1 was (-) in 87/106(82%) or (+) in 19/106(18%) of early, and (-) in 133/204(65%) or (+) in 71/204(35%) of advanced stage patients, respectively. Twenty-four patients were excluded from response analysis due to treatment escalation. After a median follow-up of 38.2 (3.2-90.2) months, 9/102-(9%) early and 43/184-(23%) advanced patients experienced a PFS event. At 36 months, negative and positive PV for iPET1 were 94% and 41% (early) and 84% and 43% (advanced), respectively. The kinetics of PET response was assessed in 198 patients with both iPETs. All 116 patients with iPET1(-) remained iPET2(-) (fast responders), 41/82 with IPET1(+) became iPET2(-) (slow responders), and the remaining 41 stayed iPET2(+) (non-responders); PFS at 36 months for fast, slow and non-responders was 0.88, 0.79 and 0.34, respectively.Conclusion: The optimal tool to predict ABVD outcome in HL remains iPET2 since it distinguishes responders, whatever their time to response, from non-responders. However, iPET1 identified fast-responders with the best outcome and might guide early treatment de-escalation both in early and advanced-stage HL.

http://ift.tt/2xaNlAq

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Δημοσίευση σχολίου

Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.