Safety and effectiveness of albuterol solutions with and without benzalkonium chloride when administered by continuous nebulization [Albuterol]

Purpose

The results of a study to determine if rates of poor response differ in patients receiving continuous nebulized albuterol (CNA) therapy with or without the preservative benzalkonium chloride are presented.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the records of all patients who received CNA therapy at a large academic medical center from July 2015 to January 2016 was conducted. Data from patient evaluations performed before and after a change to benzalkonium chloride–containing albuterol were collected. The primary outcome was the rate of poor patient response, defined as a composite endpoint. Secondary outcomes included duration of therapy, dosing requirements, and duration of supplemental oxygen therapy.

Results

There was no significant difference in rates of poor response between patients exposed (n = 80) and patients not exposed (n = 48) to benzalkonium chloride (16% and 17%, respectively; p = 0.95). The cohort not exposed to benzalkonium chloride had a median CNA duration of 7.0 hours, as compared with 10.5 hours for the cohort exposed to benzalkonium chloride, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.19). There were no significant differences between the benzalkonium chloride–exposed and nonexposed cohorts in the maximum dosing requirement (12.6 mg/hr versus 12.8 mg/hr, p = 0.89) or median duration of supplemental oxygen use (27.5 hours versus 16.5 hours, p = 0.77).

Conclusion

A study of hospitalized patients receiving CNA detected no significant difference in the frequency of poor response to therapy between groups receiving benzalkonium chloride–free versus benzalkonium chloride–containing albuterol products.

https://ift.tt/2yYmWrQ