Measuring the Impact of Research Using Conventional and Alternative Metrics

Bibliometrics utilize statistical methods to measure the scholarly impact of publications. Bibliometrics are categorized as conventional metrics (CM) or alternative metrics (AM). CM have often been considered the standard to measure the impact of publication-related scholarship. With the growing popularity of social media (SoMe) and ease of instantaneous distribution of information globally, AM have become an important complementary measure of scholarly activity. Bibliometrics may provide a standard performance measurement that may be used for tenure and/or promotion among academic institutions. The alternative metric industry has shown considerable growth with increasingly improved algorithms working towards standardization. Together, CM and AM may synergistically complement each other to provide an accelerated translation from research to clinical care that may lead to tremendous benefits in patients. All physicians and other healthcare professionals should receive training in bibliometrics and understand the potential impact of professional social media use. Corresponding Author: Sasha E. Knowlton, MD, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, 300 First Avenue, Charlestown, MA 02129, Phone: 617-952-5000, Fax: 617-952-5937, Email: seknowlton@partners.org Author Disclosures: None Competing interests: None Funding, grants, or equipment provided from any source: None Financial benefits to the authors: None Details of any previous presentation: None Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

https://ift.tt/2pJiHLx