Predictive Factors of Positive Online Patient Ratings of Spine Surgeons

Publication date: Available online 1 August 2018

Source: The Spine Journal

Author(s): Saisanjana Kalagara, Adam E.M. Eltorai, J. Mason DePasse, Alan H. Daniels

Abstract

Background

Online physician rating websites are increasingly utilized by patients to evaluate their doctors. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate factors associated with better spine surgeon ratings.

Methods

Orthopedic spine surgeons were randomly selected from the North American Spine Society directory utilizing a random number generator. Surgeon profiles on three physician rating websites, www.HealthGrades.com, www.Vitals.com, and www.RateMDs.com, were analyzed to gather qualitative and quantitative data on patients' perceptions of the surgeons. Independent variables from the websites were analyzed in relation to overall physician or patient satisfaction rating. Comments were coded by subject into three categories: professional competence, bedside manner, and practice characteristics.

Results

A total of 250 surgeons were evaluated, and 92% (n = 230) of these doctors had at least one rating among the three websites. The surgeons with a higher average rating had significantly better trust (p < 0.01), scheduling (p < 0.01), staff (p < 0.01), helpfulness (p < 0.01), and punctuality (p < 0.01) scores but significantly less experience (p < 0.05). A linear regression model for the average rating of each surgeon (R² value = 0.754) yielded only three significant variables: trustworthiness (p < 0.01), experience match (p < 0.05), and the average number of negative comments on surgeon professional competence (p < 0.05). Trustworthiness (beta = 0.749) was the strongest predictor variable of physician rating, followed by number of negative professional competence comments (beta= -0.132) and experience match (beta = -0.112).

Conclusions

This investigation assessed spine surgeon online patient ratings and categorized factors which patients associate with quality care. Trustworthiness was the most significant predictor of positive ratings, while ease of scheduling, quality of staff, helpfulness, and punctuality were also associated with higher patient ratings. Understanding what patients value may help optimize care of spine surgery patients.

https://ift.tt/2AEUxtV