Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

Αναζήτηση αυτού του ιστολογίου

Δευτέρα 28 Φεβρουαρίου 2022

Managing Cachexia in Head and Neck Cancer: a Systematic Scoping Review

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

pubmed-meta-image.png

Adv Ther. 2022 Feb 27. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02074-9. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are usually confronted with functional changes due to the malignancy itself or its treatment. These factors typically affect important structures involved in speech, breathing, chewing, swallowing, and saliva production. Consequently, the intake of food will be limited, which further contributes to loss of body weight and muscle mass, anorex ia, malnutrition, fatigue, and anemia. This multifactorial condition can ultimately lead to cancer cachexia syndrome. This study aims to examine the treatment of cachexia in HNC patients.

METHODS: We systematically searched OvidMedline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles examining the treatment of cachexia in HNC.

RESULTS: A total of nine studies were found, and these suggested interventions including nutritional, pharmacologic, therapeutic exercise, and multimodal approaches. The nutritional intervention includes essential components such as dietary counseling, oral nutritional supplements, and medical nutritional support. Individualized nutritional interventions include oral, enteral (feeding tubes i.e., percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy [PEG], nasogastric tube [NGT]) and parenteral nutrition. The pharmacologic interventions aim at increasing the appetite and weight of cachectic patients. Therapeutic exercise and increased physical activity can help to e nhance the synthesis of muscle protein, reducing inflammation and the catabolic effects of cachexia syndrome.

CONCLUSION: Owing to the multifactorial nature of this syndrome, it is expected that the management approach should be multi-interventional. Early implementation of these interventions may help to improve survival and quality of health and life of cachectic HNC patients.

PMID:35224702 | DOI:10.1007/s12325-022-02074-9

View on the web

Growth in fetuses of the constrictor pharyngis superior with special reference to its meeting with the buccinator: an embryological basis of adult variations in palatopharyngeal anatomy

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

pubmed-meta-image.png

Surg Radiol Anat. 2022 Feb 28. doi: 10.1007/s00276-022-02907-w. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The constrictor pharyngis superior (CPS) initially develops along the posterior wall of the pharyngeal mucosal tube, whereas, during the early phase, the buccinators (BC) are far anterolateral to the CPS. The process and timing of their meeting during fetal growth have not been determined.

METHODS: The topographical relationship between the growing BC and CPS was as sessed in histological sections from 22 early- and mid-term fetuses of approximate gestational age (GA) 8-16 weeks, and eight late-term fetuses of approximate GA 31-39 weeks.

RESULTS: At 8-9 weeks, the palatopharyngeus appeared to pull the CPS up and forward. Until 11 weeks, the CPS was attached to the hamulus of the pterygoid (pterygopharyngeal part). Until 13 weeks, the CPS extended anterolaterally beyond the hamulus to meet the BC. Some BC muscle fibers originated from the oral mucosa. Notably, by 30 weeks, the CPS-BC interface had become covered by or attached to the palatopharyngeus. Muscle fibers of the palatopharyngeus, however, were thinner than those of the CPS and BC. At and near the interface, BC muscle fibers tended to run along the left-right axis, whereas those of the CPS ran anteroposteriorly. A definite fascia (i.e., a future pterygomandibular raphe) was usually absent between these muscles in fetuses.

CONCLUSIONS: The excess anterior growth of the CPS wi th its subsequent degeneration might cause individual anatomical variations in composite muscle bundles of the palatopharyngeus-CPS complex or palatopharyngeal sphincter. A tensile transduction from the BC to the CPS through the raphe seemed unnecessary for cooperative suckling and swallowing after birth.

PMID:35226125 | DOI:10.1007/s00276-022-02907-w

View on the web

Quality of Life and Functionality of Head and Neck Cancer Patients Are Diminished As a Function of Sarcopenia and Obesity

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

pubmed-meta-image.png

Ear Nose Throat J. 2022 Feb 28:1455613221076791. doi: 10.1177/01455613221076791. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (QoL) is a measure that allows us to know the patient's perception of well-being and how it is affected by their disease and treatments. In cancer patients, sarcopenia has been associated with low scores on various instruments used to assess the QoL; however, little information is available on the effects of sarcopenia an d sarcopenic obesity on the QoL of patients with head and neck cancer (H&NC).

METHODS: In this cross-sectional study with 71 H&NC patients aged between 40 and 80 years, we describe the scores on the instruments EORTC QLQ C-30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 according to the sarcopenia phenotype (NSG, nonsarcopenic group; SG, sarcopenic group; and SOG, sarcopenic obesity group), hand-grip strength, gait speed, total lymphocyte count, albumin, cholesterol and C-reactive protein, and the relationships between these variables.

RESULTS: The prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity was 48% and 28%, respectively. The QoL analysis showed that NSG had higher scores on the physical functioning scale [NSG 93 (83-100); SG 73 (52-88); SOG 83 (53-93), P = .009] and lower scores on the fatigue scale [NSG 11 (0-22); S 39 (30-67); SOG 44 (14-56); P = .004]. The NSG had a higher hand-grip strength (31.1 kg) than SG (24.1 kg, P = .007) and SOG (26.3 kg, P = .001), and a lower C-reac tive protein. The SG and SOG showed no differences between them.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with sarcopenia or sarcopenic obesity have lower physical performance and a higher level of fatigue than nonsarcopenic patients. This loss of function can maintain or worsen sarcopenia due to the patient's self-restraint in physical exertion that encourages an increase in muscle tissue.

PMID:35226551 | DOI:10.1177/01455613221076791

View on the web