Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

Αναζήτηση αυτού του ιστολογίου

Τρίτη 8 Νοεμβρίου 2022

Efficacy and safety of rituximab biosimilars or reference product as first‐line treatment in patients with low‐tumour‐burden follicular lymphoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Efficacy and safety of rituximab biosimilars or reference product as first-line treatment in patients with low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Follicular lymphoma is a subtype of B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is the second most common lymphoma diagnosed in the United States and Western Europe. The role of rituximab in the first-line treatment of low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma has been supported by a large number of data. However, whether rituximab biosimilars have the same efficacy and safety as the reference drug (MabThera) is still controversial. Electronic databases and the ClinicalTrail.gov website were extensively searched using relevant search criteria. Studies were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then the risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the RoB 2 assessment scale, and the RevMan 5.4 statistical software was used for meta-analysis. Finally, four clinical randomized controlled trials involving 1223 patients were included. There were no statistically significant differences in efficacy and safety between biosimilars and MabThera groups. Our study concluded that the efficacy and safety of rituximab biosimilars in the treatment of low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma are highly similar to those of the original drug.


Abstract

What is Known and Objective

The role of rituximab in the first-line treatment of low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma (LTB-FL) has been supported by a large number of data. However, whether rituximab biosimilars have the same efficacy and safety as the reference drug (MabThera) is still controversial.

Methods

Electronic databases and the ClinicalTrail.gov website were extensively searched using relevant search criteria. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the RoB 2 assessment scale, and the RevMan 5.4 statistical software was used for meta-analysis.

Results and Discussion

A total of 1223 patients were included in four clinical randomized controlled trials. There was no statistical difference in efficacy between biosimilars and MabThera groups (the objective response rate: RR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.93–1.08, p = 0.92; the progression-free survival: RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.96–1.12, p = 0.30; the overall survival: RR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.98–1.03, p = 0.76; the serious adverse events: RR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.69–1.89, p = 0.59; the infusion-related reaction: RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77–1.09, p = 0.32). In terms of safety, there was also no significant difference between two groups.

What is New and Conclusion

Our study concluded that the efficacy and safety of rituximab biosimilars in the treatment of LTB-FL are highly similar to those of the original drug.

View on Web

Elucidating the neurological mechanism of the FLASH effect in juvenile mice exposed to hypofractionated radiotherapy

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Background
Ultra-high dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) affords improvements in the therapeutic index by minimizing normal tissue toxicities without compromising anti-tumor efficacy compared to conventional dose rate radiotherapy (CONV-RT). To investigate the translational potential of FLASH-RT to human pediatric medulloblastoma brain tumor, we used a radiosensitive juvenile mouse model to assess adverse long-term neurological outcomes.
Methods
Cohorts of three-week-old male and female C57Bl/6 mice exposed to hypofractionated (2×10 Gy, FLASH-RT or CONV-RT) whole brain irradiation and unirradiated controls underwent behavioral testing to ascertain cognitive status four months post-treatment. Animals were sacrificed 6 months post-irradiation and tissues analyzed for neurological and cerebrovascular decrements.
Results
The neurological impact of FLASH-RT was analyzed over a 6-month follow-up. FLASH-RT ameliorated neuroco gnitive decrements induced by CONV-RT and preserved synaptic plasticity and integrity at the electrophysiological (long-term potentiation), molecular (synaptophysin) and structural (Bassoon/Homer-1 bouton) levels in multiple brain regions. The benefits of FLASH-RT were also linked to reduced neuroinflammation (activated microglia) and a preservation of cerebrovascular structure, by maintaining aquaporin-4 levels and minimizing microglia colocalized to vessels.
Conclusions
Hypofractionated FLASH-RT affords significant and long-term normal tissue protection in the radiosensitive juvenile mouse brain when compared to CONV-RT. The capability of FLASH-RT to preserve critical cognitive outcomes and electrophysiological properties over 6-months is noteworthy and highlight its potential for resolving long-standing complications faced by pediatric brain tumor survivors. While care must be exercised before clinical translation is realized, present findings document the marked benefit s of FLASH-RT that extend from synapse to cognition and the microvasculature.
View on Web