Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

Αναζήτηση αυτού του ιστολογίου

Τετάρτη 29 Ιουνίου 2022

Hypothyroidism After Using Superior Thyroid Artery as A Recipient Artery

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Hypothyroidism After Using Superior Thyroid Artery as A Recipient Artery

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of the superior thyroid artery (SThA) as a recipient vessel affect thyroid dysfunction in patients undergoing TPLE combined with hemithyroidectomy. Our study revealed there was no significant difference in the postoperative hypothyroidism between patients with SThA used and not. We suggest that even after hemithyroidectomy, with inferior thyroid arteries are preserved, the SThA can be used as a recipient vessel.


Objective

Superior thyroid artery (SThA) is a common recipient artery in free tissue transfer even after total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy (TPLE) with hemithyroidectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of SThA as a recipient vessel affect thyroid function in patients undergoing TPLE with hemithyroidectomy.

Methods

From 2011 to 2020, 91 patients who underwent free jejunum transfer after TPLE with hemithyroidectomy were divided into two groups. In Group1 (n = 47), the contralateral SThA was used for the anastomosis. In Group2 (n = 44), other vessels were used. Retrospective chart review was performed comparing postoperative thyroid function between two groups.

Results

In group1, 17 patients presented hypothyroidism, 21 presented latent hypothyroidism and 9 presented no thyroid dysfunction comparing 15, 19, and 10 respectively in group 2. There were no significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion

Even after hemithyroidectomy, with inferior thyroid arteries are preserved, the SThA can be used as a recipient vessel.

Level of Evidence

3 Laryngoscope, 2022

View on Web

Endonasal access to the lateral poststyloid space: Far lateral extension of an endoscopic endonasal corridor

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

The styloid process constitutes the posterolateral boundary for an endonasal exposure of the infratemporal fossa. This study aims to explore the feasibility of a far-lateral extension to the lateral poststyloid space via an endonasal corridor. An endonasal dissection was performed on six cadaveric specimens (12 sides). Following an endoscopic endonasal access to the parapharyngeal space, the styloid process and the tympanic portion of the temporal bone were removed to reveal the jugular bulb and the extratemporal facial nerve. Distances from the anterior nasal spine to the relevant landmarks were measured using a surgical navigation device. Through an endonasal corridor, only the anteroinferior aspect of the jugular bulb was exposed. Conversely, the extratemporal facial nerve could be sufficiently exposed, and the deep temporal nerve could be transposed to the stylomastoid foramen. The average horizontal distances from the nasal spine to the posterior tract of V3, stylo id process, and facial nerve were 79.33 ± 3.41, 97.10 ± 4.74, and 104.77 ± 4.42 mm, respectively. Access to the lateral poststyloid space via an endonasal corridor is feasible, potentially providing an alternative approach to address select lesions extending to this region. The deep temporal nerve has a similar diameter to that of the facial nerve; thus, providing potential reinnervation of the facial nerve.

View on Web

Safety and value of pre‐transplant antibiotic allergy delabeling in a quaternary transplant center

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Background

Self-reported antibiotic allergies, also known as antibiotic allergy labels, are common and may lead to worse patient outcomes. Within immunocompromised patients, antibiotic allergy labels can lead to inappropriate use of antimicrobials and may limit options for prophylactic and therapeutic options in the post-transplant period. While antibiotic allergy delabeling is considered an important aspect of antibiotic stewardship protocols, evidence and awareness of its application in transplant recipients is limited.

Methods

We describe our experience with an antibiotic allergy delabeling intervention in the pre-transplant evaluation period and its impact on post-transplant antimicrobial utilization. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with an antibiotic allergy label who underwent evaluation for solid organ or stem cell transplantation between 2015–2020. Patients included in this analysis were those who completed pre-transplant antibiotic allergy delabeling through our Drug Allergy Clinic and were retained in care for six months after transplant.

Results

Twenty-six of 27 patients underwent pre-transplant antibiotic allergy delabeling and safely received the delabeled antibiotic post-transplant. There were no reported side effects to the delabeled antibiotic within 6 months post-transplant. Specific examination of sulfonamide (sulfa)-antibiotic delabeling showed cost savings of $254 to $2,910 per patient in the post-transplant period compared to the use of alternative antibiotics for prophylaxis protocol.

Conclusion

Antibiotic allergy delabeling prior to transplant is safe, is of high value, and should be considered in the pre-transplant evaluation period. More resources are needed for the development of delabeling guidelines and support for broad implementation of pre-transplant antibiotic allergy delabeling programs.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

View on Web