3D-printed template and optical needle navigation in CT-guided iodine-125 permanent seed implantation

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader 3D-printed template and optical needle navigation in CT-guided iodine-125 permanent seed implantation Via radioactive iodine J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2021 Aug;13(4):410-418. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2021.108595. Epub 2021 Aug 24. ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To preliminarily verify the accuracy of navigation-assisted seed implantation by comparing pre-operative and actual differences in puncture characteristics and dosimetry in computed tomography (CT)-guided, navigation-assisted radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation, using 3D-printed templates for malignant tumors' treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 27 t umor patients, who were treated with seed implantation under combination guidance in our hospital between December 2019 and December 2020 were enrolled in this study. Navigation needles (n = 1-3) were placed in each patient to obtain pre-operative and intra-operative puncture information, such as angle, depth, insertion point, and tip position. Moreover, dosimetry parameters in pre-operative and post-operative plans, including D90, V100, V150, V200, minimum peripheral dose (MPD), conformal index, external index, and homogeneity index of target area were investigated. RESULTS: Mean errors of the angle, depth, insertion point, and tip position were 0.5 ±0.5°, 4.0 ±2.0 mm, 1.7 ±1 mm, and 3.1 ±1.8 mm, respectively. There were no significant differences between intra-operative and pre-operative angles (p = 0.271), but there was a significant difference in the depth (p = 0.002). Errors of the angle, depth, and ins ertion point were larger for the pelvic/retroperitoneal area than for the head and neck/chest wall (p < 0.05). With the exception of MPD, there was no significant difference in dosimetry indices between post-operative and preoperative plans (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Seed implantation under combination guidance showed good accuracy, and the actual intra-operative puncture information and post-operative doses were in agreement with those in the pre-operative plan, thereby demonstrating promising prospects for further development. PMID:34484355 | PMC:PMC8407253 | DOI:10.5114/jcb.2021.108595 View on the web Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

Cochlear implantation under local anesthesia in 117 cases: patients' subjective experience and outcomes

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader Cochlear implantation under local anesthesia in 117 cases: patients' subjective experience and outcomes Via http://link.springer.com/journal/405,European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology,The European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Sep 6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07061-4. Online ahead of print. ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To report the outcomes and the patients' subjective experience of cochlear implantation (CI) performed under local anesthesia (LA). To describe a new form of intraoperative cochlear monitoring based on the patients subjective sound perception during CI. METHODS: In this retrospective case-cohort study, 117 patients underwent CI under LA with (n = 58) or without conscious sedation (n = 59). Included were primarily elderly patients with elevated risks for general anesthesia and recently patients with residual hearing eligible for electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS) (n = 27), in whom hearing could be monitored during the electrode insertion. A 500 Hz test tone was presented and the patient reported of subjective changes in loudness, leading to a modification of the insertion. A questionnaire was sent to all patients in whi ch they assessed their subjective experience. RESULTS: All patients were successfully operated under LA without the need to intraoperatively convert to general anesthesia. 90% of the patients reported that the surgery was a positive experience. The vast majority, 90% of patients were satisfied with the overall treatment and with intraoperative pain management and 84% of the patients would opt for local anesthesia again. Cochlear monitoring by the patients' subjective sound perception enabled for atraumatic insertions as all EAS patients could hear the test tone up to the end of the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: CI under LA was well tolerated and recommended by the vast majority of patients. In addition, it offers the possibility to monitor the patients' hearing during the electrode insertion, which may help to prevent insertion trauma. PMID:34487218 | DOI:10.1007/s00405-021-07061-4 View on the web Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.