Post-tetanic transcranial motor evoked potentials augments the amplitude of compound muscle action potentials recorded from innervated and non-innervated muscles

Publication date: Available online 1 September 2017
Source:The Spine Journal
Author(s): Hideki Shigematsu, Masahiko Kawaguchi, Hironobu Hayashi, Tsunenori Takatani, Eiichiro Iwata, Masato Tanaka, Akinori Okuda, Yasuhiko Morimoto, Keisuke Masuda, Yuusuke Yamamoto, Yasuhito Tanaka
Background ContextTranscranial electrical stimulation used to produce motor evoked potentials (TES-MEP) and subsequent compound muscle action potential (CMAP) recording is widely used to monitor motor function during surgery when there is risk of damaging the spinal cord. Nonetheless, some muscles do not produce CMAP amplitudes sufficient for intraoperative monitoring.PurposeTo investigate the utility of tetanic stimulation at single and multiple peripheral nerve sites for augmenting CMAP amplitudes recorded from innervated and non-innervated muscles.Study Design/SettingRetrospective study.Patient SampleTwenty-four patients with cervical myelopathy who underwent decompression surgery at our department between November 2005 and March 2007.Outcome MeasuresCMAP amplitude as a physiologic measure.MethodsWe used two patterns of tetanic peripheral nerve stimulation for each patient. The first pattern consisted of tetanic stimulation of the left tibial nerve only (Pattern 1), and the second pattern consisted of tetanic stimulation of the bilateral median nerves and left tibial nerve (Pattern 2).ResultsCMAP amplitudes from all muscles were augmented by both tetanic stimulation patterns compared to conventional TES-MEP recording; however, Pattern 2 elicited the greatest augmentation of CMAP amplitudes, especially for CMAPs recorded from the bilateral abductor pollicis brevis muscles.ConclusionsAlthough tetanic stimulation of a single peripheral nerve increased CMAP amplitudes recorded from both innervated and non-innervated muscles, CMAP amplitudes were best augmented when the corresponding nerve received tetanic stimulation. Additionally, tetanic stimulation of multiple nerves rather than a single nerve appears to provide better augmentation.



http://ift.tt/2etdX7c