Feasibility and acceptability of food‐based complementary feeding recommendations using Trials of Improved Practices among poor families in rural Eastern and Western Uganda

Complementary feeding practices are poor in Uganda. While this is so, context‐specific complementary feeding recommendations do not exist. This article provides results of a feasibility and acceptability of context‐specific complementary feeding recommendations in rural Uganda, using trails of improved practices.

Abstract

Inadequate complementary feeding practices are a major contributor to stunting among children in Uganda. The WHO recommends the promotion of local food‐based complementary feeding recommendations (FBCFRs) to address nutrient gaps during complementary feeding. This study tested the feasibility and acceptability of FBCFRs, using trials of improved practices (TIPs). Qualitative and quantitative methods were used in a cross‐sectional survey over three household visits. At first household visit, information on socio‐demographic factors and food frequency was collected and FBCFRs introduced. The second household visit assessed the use and barriers related to the FBCFRs, while the third household visit assessed the continued use of the FBCFRs. Focus group discussions and key informant interviews provided the insights into community norms on the FBCFRs. Most FBCFRs were feasible and acceptable. However, caretakers found it difficult to implement a full set of FBCFRs together with the recommended frequencies. Caretakers were more likely to try and continue using FBCFRs that had familiar methods of preparation and commonly used ingredients. Seasonality and cost were major barriers to use. Through TIPs, mothers demonstrated that they are open to try new ways of improving their children's nutrition.

https://ift.tt/2H7tCJ5