Objective
Examine the safety of menstrual cups against sanitary pads and usual practice in Kenyan schoolgirls.
DesignObservational studies nested in a cluster randomised controlled feasibility study.
Setting30 primary schools in a health and demographic surveillance system in rural western Kenya.
ParticipantsMenstruating primary schoolgirls aged 14–16 years participating in a menstrual feasibility study.
InterventionsInsertable menstrual cup, monthly sanitary pads or 'usual practice' (controls).
Outcome measuresStaphylococcus aureus vaginal colonization, Escherichia coli growth on sampled used cups, toxic shock syndrome or other adverse health outcomes.
ResultsAmong 604 eligible girls tested, no adverse event or TSS was detected over a median 10.9 months follow-up. S. aureusprevalence was 10.8%, with no significant difference over intervention time or between groups. Of 65 S.aureus positives at first test, 49 girls were retested and 10 (20.4%) remained positive. Of these, two (20%) sample isolates tested positive for toxic shock syndrome toxin-1; both girls were provided pads and were clinically healthy. Seven per cent of cups required replacements for loss, damage, dropping in a latrine or a poor fit. Of 30 used cups processed for E. coli growth, 13 (37.1%, 95% CI 21.1% to 53.1%) had growth. E. coli growth was greatest in newer compared with established users (53%vs22.2%, p=0.12).
ConclusionsAmong this feasibility sample, no evidence emerged to indicate menstrual cups are hazardous or cause health harms among rural Kenyan schoolgirls, but large-scale trials and post-marketing surveillance should continue to evaluate cup safety.
http://ift.tt/2p9i5MK
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.