Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

Αναζήτηση αυτού του ιστολογίου

Σάββατο 19 Μαΐου 2018

Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis

We thank Jacques and colleagues for their critical appraisal of our manuscript.1 2 Although recurrence is a shortcoming of wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR), it is typically unifocal, diminutive and its management does not add substantial cost beyond that of the surveillance colonoscopy. Our base case rate of 14.4% was determined from our large prospective WF-EMR cohort and is consistent with a recent meta-analysis (13.8%).3 We modelled recurrence rates following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) that were six- to sevenfold lower and in line with the rates quoted by the French group. Our modelled assumptions reflect contemporary evidence and favour ESD given adjunctive thermal ablation of the post-EMR margin4 has been shown to reduce recurrence following WF-EMR to 5%–6% including for larger lesions.

ESD is a revolutionary procedure and likely to become more efficient, but is currently far more time and resource consuming than WF-EMR....



https://ift.tt/2KEkcDk

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Δημοσίευση σχολίου

Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.