CBCT imaging vs conventional radiography

In their systematic review, Eslami et al acknowledged that CBCT imaging may be more effective than conventional radiography in canine impaction cases that are difficult to diagnose (Eslami E, Barkhordar H, Abramovitch K, Kim J, Masoud MI. Cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional radiography in visualization of maxillary impacted-canine localization: a systematic review of comparative studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:248-58). Unfortunately, they may not have provided the best available evidence for making clinical decisions otherwise.

http://ift.tt/2eVAwoR